Occult Features of Anarchism

With Attention to the Conspiracy of Kings and the Conspiracy of the Peoples

Paperback, 138 pages

English language

Published 2019 by PM Press.

ISBN:
978-1-62963-579-8
Copied ISBN!
OCLC Number:
1029568343

View on OpenLibrary

View on Inventaire

4 stars (1 review)

In the nineteenth century anarchists were accused of conspiracy by governments afraid of revolution, but in the current century various “conspiracy theories” suggest that anarchists are controlled by government itself. The Illuminati were a network of intellectuals who argued for self-government and against private property, yet the public is now often told that they were (and are) the very group that controls governments and defends private property around the world. Intervening in such misinformation, Lagalisse works with primary and secondary sources in multiple languages to set straight the history of the Left and illustrate the actual relationship between revolutionism, pantheistic occult philosophy, and the clandestine fraternity.

Exploring hidden correspondences between anarchism, Renaissance magic, and New Age movements, Lagalisse also advances critical scholarship regarding leftist attachments to secular politics. Inspired by anthropological fieldwork within today’s anarchist movements, her essay challenges anarchist atheism insofar as it poses practical challenges for coalition politics …

4 editions

Short Reflection on Occult Features of Anarchism

4 stars

This was a rather short read. Feels incomplete and pointed instead of neatly woven. It has its points in the right analysis of neglect of idea history parts that do not favor the current perception of what is needed in anarchist practices (or to draw wrong traditions). A bit too much focussed around Freemasons, could have written more about (or at all) heretic Christian anarchists (I.e. the Dutch or Belgian, the American settler communes (Owenites are mentioned in two paragraphs)).

The book should be longer.

  • Good for name dropping and connections,
  • bad on what actually connects them (beyond a few points and adjectives, I was a bit sad about that).
  • Theosophy is named a few times, but no compelling story is told, just hinted. Goldman vs. Krishnamurti was fun to discover.
  • Good for sources and references.
  • Mysticism (meister ekkehard) is not mentioned enough, as well as Spinozist traditions (Landauer, Rocker, …