#ai

See tagged statuses in the local Gatti Ninja community

Had my GF write her post, then realized I may not have done that for this account. Even if I have, sometimes it’s good to revisit because interests and focuses do change. 😊

My name is Kaylie (she/her), though my friends usually call me Kayls or Fox. I’m a , , girl living in Minnesota with my girlfriend and our three cats.

I’m a , pretty much exclusively on PC these days, though I enjoy with slightly older and much older titles via . My current gaming obsession is , though I have a weird schedule of binging it for weeks on end, then drifting away for a while. I've been a gamer in some capacity or another for practically all but the first four years of my life, so...

Other …

With the bubble in full swing many use the Gartner Hype Cycle as an illustration for where we are and how the next month will be. That feel reasonable but often comes with one uninterrogated assumption: The Gartner Hype Cycle implies that everything will at some point become useful/part of normal life etc.

But not everything comes back after the crash. Crypto didn't (so far). Metaverse didn't. And GenerativeAI also might very well not given that the costs are prohibitive, the quality is mediocre and the legal situation is dubious. Yes, genAI will stick around because it generates great spam. But implying that it will be kinda everywhere "like the Internet" is ... a very optimistic stretch.

Musk threatens : “X’s chatbot Grok, shared with Ms of users false info. suggesting that wasn't eligible to appear on the 2024 pres. ballot.

The letter, by MN SoS Simon & signed by 4 counterparts, urges to “immediately implement changes to X’s Grok, to ensure voters have accurate info.

Within hours of Biden’s suspending his pres. campaign, “false info. on ballot deadlines produced by Grok was shared on multiple SM platforms.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/08/04/secretaries-state-urge-musk-fix-ai-chatbot-spreading-false-election-info/


Le Big Tech e il racconto dell’intelligenza artificiale https://centroriformastato.it/le-big-tech-e-il-racconto-dellintelligenza-artificiale/
"Il problema politico relativo allo sviluppo e alle applicazioni dei sistemi di intelligenza artificiale non riguarda l’allineamento di una mente artificiale con i nostri valori, ma il disallineamento tra gli interessi dei monopoli della tecnologia e l’interesse pubblico."
Questo testo ha rischiato di non essere "pubblicato" o di non essere reso pubblico. Ma autrice e CRS hanno scelto altrimenti.

Ma come si fa a fare ricerche di questo genere?
Hanno valutato le performance dei LLMs attraverso test psicologici elaborati nell’ambito della Theory of Mind (ToM). Non è la prima volta che vengono somministrati test psicologici a una macchina per ricavarne conclusioni infondate. Qui siamo proprio all’assurdo. La ToM non è la Bibbia e nemmeno un teorema di meccanica razionale. È una teoria cognitivista non condivisa da tutti, nemmeno tra i cognitivisti stessi. Ma soprattutto, valutare le performance dei LLMs attraverso le teorie cognitiviste che prendono a modello il funzionamento dei computer per spiegare i processi di pensiero umani è una piena e assurda tautologia. Una barzelletta!
La ricerca, manco a dirlo, è stata fatta nei laboratori Google. Se la cantano e se la suonano.

Link alla ricerca: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.18870